PayPal Donation Link

PayPal Donation Link
PayPal Donations For continued research into British foxes and canids world wide

Wednesday, 2 September 2026

Facial Injury In Foxes CAN Be Treated

  The old rule under certain "rescue" was a fox with a facial injury HAD to be put down. Most vets would agree.

However, things in Bristol have changed. Likely an injury from a car swipe on the nearby busy road the fox was treated for around 9 weeks given pain relief and anti biotics. All treated in situ by Sarah Mills.
With a falling fox population at least this one now has a good chance.

above during treatment
Above after treatment

Thursday, 6 August 2026

ASK Questions. Check Dead Animals

 

 Whether otters, foxes, badgers, pine martens or birds of prey be aware: killing them and dumping them by the side of the road is an old farmers trick.


Above: otter left at roadside. Car was stopped as it was thought to be a fox at first. Cause of death? Snaring

The Fox Death study found two fox snaring cases -both found by the roadside.

People seeing dead wildlife by the road assume all are road kill so why ask questions?


You SHOULD ask questions.


Tennis Club Kills Geese -membership costs, facilities and famous members seem more important

 I posted This Is What The UK Thinks of Wildlife and guess what?  Even more evidence. Natural England seem to sign off on animal death warrants (oops. "Cull licences") like people throw confetti at a wedding. Are they being paid for these licences?  Does anyone at NE even check personally on a situation before issuing a licence to kill wildlife -and this is far more common than people know- ?  Oh, the old "Health and public safety" excuse -the club spokesman uses the phrase a lot along with the crocodile tears and "we never wanted to do this"fakery.  

Name the "pest controller"/company who carried out the killings. 

Every night hundreds of men and women (including off duty police officers ("blue insurance") go out 'sport' shooting -foxes, deer, birds in fact anything "legal" or illegal for kicks. HOW can polirticians say we have the greatest gun control when morons rush out to shoot and kill every day?  And Natural England mentions declining species numbers (well, they try to avoid it unless it serves a purpose) and "environmental causes" but totally ignore the, uh, 'sportsmen' -the same type of people who wiped out so many UK species in the 19th cemtury -all through 'sport'.

Many thouysands of birds are killed by local authorities each year on, uh "health and safety" grounds. 300,000 badgers were killed (Wales wants to go for a cull next) based on fake science and health and safety issues.

The UK is simply anti wildlife and takes any opportunity (even without cars) to kill it -shooting, snaring, poisoning it goes on and on and everyone puts on the fake smiling face and "We LOVE Wildlife" badgeswhile hiding their blood stained hands behind their backs.



Geese and goslings at the club

Tennis club secretly asked marksman to shoot geese

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/tennis-club-secretly-asked-marksman-212527298.html

The Canada geese that visited St George's Hill had become a familiar sight, regularly appearing on the club's social media channels

Members of one of Britain's most prestigious tennis clubs have cried foul over the secret culling of a gaggle of geese.

They are "furious" after the management at St George's Hill Lawn Tennis Club in Weybridge, Surrey, called in a marksman to stop the birds making a mess of the courts.

Residents reported hearing a volley of gunshots shortly after sunrise and later learned that eight birds had been killed, including goslings, according to The Times.

The club, set on the exclusive St George's Hill estate, has long been associated with famous residents including John Lennon, Jenson Button and Sue Barker.

Members pay an annual fee of £2,664 on top of a £2,000 joining charge. In return, they have access to 34 courts, including grass, clay and indoor surfaces, as well as a swimming pool and clubhouse.

The club was also where Emma Raducanu won the UK Pro Series and the UK Pro Classic in 2020, a year before her US Open triumph.

It has previously embraced the Canada geese on its social media channels, sharing a photo last year of two young birds waddling, captioned: "We have baby goslings on our Lakeside Terrace!"

The year before, it posted a photograph of two adults and two goslings walking across a tennis court in wet weather, captioned: "Canadian geese family enjoyed the courts today."

An adult and gosling who were spared the cull on July 16 were allegedly "found in a distressed state the same day wandering the local area", according to a social media post.

It said: "The tennis club claim they were pests and murdered them by the club's lake, which they used as their home, much to the delight of the young and old club members. Such barbaric action in a situation where local wildlife organisations would have taken them in."

Members claimed the birds were part of the "beauty" of the club and that they were not consulted about the cull.

"The members have always liked the geese," one long-standing member said. "It is sometimes a bit annoying because they amble on to the courts and leave their poo.

"But that does not mean they had to be shot. It's a private estate and the residents are concerned about a firearm being brought in without any warning."

Another player added: "The club management ordered this because they felt the birds were making the courts messy. There was no consultation with the members. The club is in a beautiful setting and the birds were part of that."

One member claimed they were initially told the birds had been relocated, only to find out later that they had been shot.

"The Canada geese were adored and loved. They walked around the club at their own pace and sometimes held up the traffic, but nobody minded," they said.

"First we were told they had been rehomed and then that they had 'flown off'. The members and local residents are furious."

The shooting, which started at 5.25am, was carried out by a marksman operating under a Natural England licence permitting the culling of certain bird species to protect public health and safety.

Surrey Police said they were informed about the shooting at 5.18am by a pest controller.

Miles Hill, the club's chief executive, said: "We fully understand that some members and estate residents have been upset by what occurred.

"This was not a decision the club wished to take, nor one that was taken lightly. It followed many months of attempting to manage a growing resident population of Canada geese through enhanced cleaning and non-lethal measures.

"The decision was taken primarily on the grounds of public health and public safety.

"Despite extensive daily cleaning by multiple members of our grounds team, we were increasingly unable to keep pace with the volume of faeces being produced."

Mr Hill said it was important for the cull to remain secret so the operation could be carried out safely.

"The decision reflected a genuine desire to avoid causing unnecessary concern, distress or alarm over what was a lawful operational matter undertaken in the interests of public health and safety," he added.

He said the club had "reflected carefully" on the incident and was developing a wildlife management plan under which lethal control would remain a measure of "absolute last resort".

"The recent arrival of further Canada geese at the lake reinforces why the club's future focus will be on preventing geese from establishing themselves in heavily used member areas, rather than relying on relocation, which is neither a practical nor sustainable long-term solution," he said.

"Where members made inquiries to me about the absence of the geese, I responded directly, openly and honestly, explaining the reasons for the decision and the background that led to it."

Canada Geese were introduced to Britain in the 17th century and were recorded as part of King Charles II's waterfowl collection in St James's Park, central London, in 1665.

They are now well established in the UK, with the RSPCA placing their number at about 190,000.


Thursday, 23 July 2026

THIS Is What The UK Thinks of Wildlife

 

Someone shot and killed a deer, fox, badger and some rabbits then threw them over a gate in Hambrook. They were caught on CCTV and police involved. I have been asked to be kept informed but wildlife crime seems to be treated as a waste of time. Every night men and women go out to shoot and kill for 'fun' and their FB groups call them "sportsmen/women".

Cats, sheep -boring night anything is a fair target. There is no reason why anyone in the UK should have a fire arm other for in enclosed shooting ranges for 'sport'

I have given up on the UK as the people in it seem set to want to kill anything wild.

Friday, 17 July 2026

Badger 076

 

076         Tuesday 14 07 2026 My friend described seeing a dead badger on the A38 near to Thornbury, she believes it was trying to cross the road but was blocked by huge barriers erected by the council while  they lay a new cycle path  She rang the council to complain, but was kept waiting so long she gave up

Wednesday, 15 July 2026

Poisoned? The REPORT and SUBMIT

 


If you ever take a sick fox into a vet and it dies then let us know, If the vet says "It's been poiisoned" then tell them it is a possible wildlife crime and as its poison the fox needs to be submitted to the Wildlife Crimes Investigation Unit or, in Bristol, contact Bristol Uni Post Mortem Services and ask to submit the fox for post mortem examination (PME).

If the vet refuses here is what to bear in mind:
While a vet is generally bound by strict client confidentiality, the [Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons](https://www.rcvsknowledge.org/.../when-is-it-safe-to.../) (RCVS) explicitly allows them to bypass this rule and report concerns to the relevant authorities if they believe the wider public interest or animal welfare is severely compromised.
The illegal use of pesticides or poisons can be reported to the government's [Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme](https://www.hse.gov.uk/.../wildlife-incident...) (WIIS) on 0800 321 600.
We have had seven vets in Bristol over the past few years who have told people "Its been poisoned" and in all cases the foxes were victims of car strike.
"Poison" -report and submit. NEVER EVER state an animal has been poisoned unless you have evidence as certain symptoms often quoted as evidence of poisoning can be related to other causes of death.
Thank you and good night Vienna.

Saturday, 11 July 2026

Poisoned Foxes -or Not? Update 15 07 2026

 UPDATE: The response to my post was...one that sounded confused but as far as I am aware no fox has been submitted as having been a victim of poisoning. This sort of lack of action is what allows real wildlife crime to go unreported/. If poison is suspected the REPORT it (not to the police).



This was posted to The Greenwich Wildlife Network:

Fox Guardians

WARNING to wildlife lovers and pet parents in Broadstairs! There is been a string of fox poisonings in the Stone Bay area (Eastern Esplanade, town centre end). So far 7 (!) cubs and 1 vixen have been found dead in the garden of a fox lover in quick succession.

The cases which constitute a wildlife crime have been reported to the wildlife officer at Kent police.

If one of your fox friends arrives and is struggling to breathe and seems wobbly, get them to a vet as soon as possible. Briar House Vets have been informed about the poisonings and Kent Wildlife Rescue Service could help getting the fox rescued.

If you find a dead fox in your garden, do not handle the body as the police would only consider collecting it for a postmortem if it was not 'contaminated' by being handled. Poisoned foxes often have a frothy discharge caming from their mouth.

I know this is challenging but do take pictures from various angles and call to police quoting crime reference number #09-1286.

Currently this case is "closed" due to lack of evidence but that could change because someone somewhere may know something.

If you know something, be the voice for foxes and speak up. If we don't show compassion, what is it that defines us?!

The vixen in this picture (not included in this post –TH) is a juvenile called Hazel. She is such a sweet little soul that I had the pleasure to look after over the last 2 weeks. She lives just a few gardens away from where the seven fox cubs that were of the same age as her were cruelly poisoned.

At 5 months old, their lives had only just begun. Their lives were not our to take. I and Hazel's guardian Jill are so very worried for her and her family. Be safe little one!

 

I responded:

Hi.

I have run the British Fox Study since 1976 and headed the onmly UK post mortem study of unusual deaths in foxes. The first question I have to ask is whether there has been a post mortem (in suspected poisoning cases you can get free PMs via the Animal Plant Health Agency) to identify poisonings?

The reason I ask is that when we started our work we had foxes that were found dead and unmarked in feeders gardens, foxes seen staggering, coughing and then collapsing. All were suspected poisonings.

As it turns out all were victims of cars -no broken bones found but all injuries were internal. Some were even found to be down to unsuspected illnesses. It can never be put down to poison until a post mortem as that will involve tests etc.

In case anyone is interested in what our study found I will include a link. https://foxandcanids.blogspot.com/.../bristol-foxes-study... I can be PM'd

I should have pointed out  that the discharge/froth from the mouth could also indicate thoracic damage. The only way you can 100% state poison is after testing.

 I also need to point out that Kent Police are talking complete and utter crap if they did say they would only handle a fox that has not been touch. I could use stronger words. Kent as a county is not known for liking foxes and I suspect the police just cannot be bothered because it was a fox.

A post mortem examines the internal organs and test samples are taken to check for poison and to identify what it was –if a crime or suspected crime the police tend to do nothing if my experience over the last few decades proves anything. If it is a rodenticide then it can become an investigation by the Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme (WIIS). The person recovering the fox, the lab technicians etc all handle the fox and there has NEVER been the line “If touched we can do nothing” –a police Community Service Officer collected two foxes and a cat in a suspected poison case and that was after reportees had moved the animals to keep safe. In that case all turned out to be road casualties.

The knee jerk “It’s poison!” statement once spread, as we found in Bristol, attracts almost hysteria and local journalists love a “juicy story” – “The Bristol Fox Poisoner(s)” was a result of absolutely no evidence but people stating as fact anything they heard. 

At least three vets with different foxes stated “Its poison” –all foxes were found to have internal injuries caused by cars.

182 Recorded Fox Deaths In Bristol So Far -What Is The Actual Total?

 


I get used to the comments from morons (I am no longer polite about this) that the more foxes killed on the road the better for gardens, homes and the environment.

I am not joking. I once pointed out to a woman whowrote this that foxes were good for the environment and the best pest controllers for rats and micve that you can have. "I'd sooner have the rats!" was t6he response.
Another person who did everything possible to discourage foxes BECAUSE "I have a garden rat" ignored all the advice and told me "No one asked for your opinion -it's my garden!" About 9 months later she was posting for advice as "my garden is over run with rats".
AQt the moment we have recorded 182 known fox deaths in the City and there is a way of trying to guage from that the actual number that have died -I will upload the document on assessment to files).
Hold on to your seats:
If 182 foxes are counted as road casualties, the true number is likely much higher. Wildlife studies show that reported roadkill usually accounts for only 1/12th to 1/16th of actual casualties. This means the probable actual number of foxes killed is between 2,184\ and 2,912
That is terrifying to even think about with a national fox population that is declining at a steady rate 0thanks to humans. I would like to thyink the number is lower at 300+ which is still far too high but when drivers go speeding during the day and night and kill pets and don't stop or report and even hit people....at night it is free reign!

Tuesday, 7 July 2026

Want To Be Recognised As A Nature Reserve? CARE About Nature

  Last night we had a report of a badger seen dragging its back legs in the Novers Hill area. Sarah Mills has searched the fields but no sign of a sett. I have appealed on Bristol FDoxes and Badgers and here for anyone who knows where a sett is but no responses.

The Novers Hill Community group my posts to have been rejected all day and neither ofd the two moderators have gotten back to me.
THIS is standard Bristol coopperation on wildlife.
The hope is that, being tough creatures, the badger just got knocked and has bruising. The other alternative is that it is lying somewhere injured (likely a garden) or is dead.
Criticise me as being "negative" as much as you want but when it is a major fight to even get a response from one person I doubt my attitude will change.

Groups representing themselves as wanting to become recognised as nature reserves should actually CARE about nature.

Tuesday, 30 June 2026

Snared Fox

 

Just had to post this out to a local community group:

 Hello.

Can I warn members to be alert if they have pet cats in the area. Bristol Wildlife Rescue were called out to a fox in Rudgeway Road that was victim of a snare. This has now been reported as a wildlife crime to police.

Snares will catch hedgehogs, pet cats and other animals(including birds). If anyone has information regarding snaring in the area please contact the police."

Details:

Tuesday 30 06 2026 Rudgeway Park, Rudgeway, Bristol BS35 3RU

Male 4.6kgs   Elderly   Damage originally caught in snare.  Ruptured Lung diaphragm and liver  Slowly bleeding internally and black dark blood visible from back end

Pts at Vets4pets who are reporting this as a wildlife crime.


Monday, 29 June 2026

Bristol Is An Environmental Disaster In The Making

 Bristol is a good example of what is going on around the country. It has a Green Party controlled council that is overseeing environmental damage for development money.

Bristol Naturalist Society and Bristol Nature Network will not push or do anything because "its political". NO. It is about saving the environment and wildlife they are supposed to have a deep interest in!
2032 and Bristol's top park still attracts photographers!


We are seeing more and more green spaces in Bristol being marked for development.

A school wants a car park and txi space -dig up the green.
Council wants as much money as it can get so "unavoidably" chop down more mature trees and stick a few saplings in to replace them (not that they'll last long as they are vandal magnets.
Tenants dig up hedgerows and cut down council (therefore publicly owned) trees as they are 'desperate' for that driveway. Let them get away with it.
Territory with established badger setts and wildlife look very green and pretty -what developers are looking for. Sell it off for (non) affordable housing.
Bristol will get 5 new towns (suburbs) and guess where they will be built? One is already encroaching badger and otter land and by not responding Long Ashton Parish Council does not have to turn down any money. Bristol City Council under a very false Green Party council that daily breaks its own party's aims and promises do like wise -real examples of See No, Hear No, Speak No evil.
The odd moan does NOTHING.
Groups in Bristol should have united ten years ago but instead they operate individually and can be ignored or given the usual "Here is a lie you'll swallow until it is too late".
I can see parents in 20 years time speaking to their children: "There are no green spaces to visit or play on and not many trees or wildlife because mummy and daddy decided we would sit on our asses and watch TV and see if someone else would do anything. I know you are 8 but a 5 mile walk to the nearest park is good for you."

Wednesday, 24 June 2026

Here is the thing: I do not see wildlife as a hobby.



Here is the thing: I do not see wildlife as a hobby.
From picking up worms and beetles in the back garden of Sevier Street to wandering around the countryside/forests in Germany and back to the UK I have never had a day when I am not observing or checking things.
So please never ever call it a hobby to my face or I might bite.
I am known outside the UK on wild canids and felids. I have my name on technical papers presented to conferences. Why am I not more widely known (ignoring the fact I hate publicity)?
I chose foxes, jackals, coyotes and wolves as well as badgers and wild cats (I don't think it was ever a choice). Had I gone for otters, beaver or some other popular animal I'd probably be better known and have some funding!

Friday, 19 June 2026

Do Rodenticides Kill Hedgehogs? Is That A Silly Question...

 


Avon Wildlife News (24:26) carries the following:

"Helping Hedgehogs

Isabella Clark is a researcher based at the University of Reading currently recruiting volunteers across the UK for a citizen science project investigating how urban hedgehogs may be exposed to rodenticides (rat poison) in gardens.    One potential route of exposure involves hedgehogs occurring in the same gardens as rats and mice, where rodenticides may be used to treat infestations.    As a result, hedgehogs in these areas may be more likely to encounter these toxins.

Isabella is looking for volunteers with access to a garden and a motion-activated wildlife or security camera.    Participants will be asked to monitor a leaking tin of sardines in their garden for 1–2 weeks.    No prior experience is required, and full instructions will be provided.

The findings from this project may help improve understanding of the risks rodenticides pose to urban hedgehogs and inform more wildlife-friendly pest control practices.

The project is planned to begin in July 2026, with additional surveys taking place in winter 2026/2027. For more information and to apply, please visit https://sites.googlr.com/view/gardenwildlife-org/home and contact isabella.clark@pgr.reading.ac.uk if you have any questions."

I laughed.  Sorry....monitor a leaking can of sardines for two weeks?  How will it be made to leak? 

1.   An open can leaking poses a risk to foxes, badgers (yes hedgehogs and badgers do frequent the same gardens) and while either might carry the can off.

2. what about rats?  If rats are nearby why would you want to attract them to your propperty? I have first hand experience of what just what damage one lonbe rat can do in a fedw minutes. 

3. I can see a few good cat fights over this leaky can. 

Not sure how this will show hedgehogs will be attracted to rodenticides. I found two dead in my garden early last year after rodenticides were used in three adjacent properties and his have been seen for the first time in the last week. 

I ought to point out that no one was interested in carrying out post mortems on my two hogs and, although there is no exact national figure for the total number of UK hedgehogs killed by rodenticide research shows that nearly all (up to 100%) wild British hedgehogs are exposed to anticoagulant rat and mouse poisons, primarily through secondary poisoning from eating contaminated slugs and insects. (The Telegraph  26 08 2009) A Bristol University study by Dr Claire Dowding who stated that:

""This high figure really is of concern and might be one of the reasons why the British hedgehog population is thought to be declining.

"It's difficult to tell exactly how these animals are exposed to the chemicals.

"They may be eating them directly, scavenging on dead rodents that have been killed by the poison or eating their favourite diet of slugs and snails that have fed on the poison bait."

The study provided the following detailed findings:
  • Exposure Rate: Out of 120 hedgehog carcasses examined, 67% (80 hedgehogs) showed direct exposure to rat poison.
  • Urban Vulnerability: Hedgehogs in urban environments have significantly higher concentrations of toxic chemicals in their systems.
  • Lethality: While secondary poisoning can cause fatal internal hemorrhaging, many die from chronic, compounding toxicity rather than immediate acute poisoning. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
For context, this threat exacerbates severe population declines. By comparison, human-related hazards like road traffic kill an estimated 100,000 to 335,000 hedgehogs every year in the UK -not to forget the deer5, foxes, badgers, otters and birds. Our roads arte the new "Killing fields".
Well, maybe Ms Clark has not heard of the Bristol study -it was in 2009 after all.  It should also be pointed out that for over 20 years I have stated and challenged rodentiocides available to buy in shops.  There ARE alternatives to rodenticides.
Also, tut tut.... only the public are to blame? In the Bristol Fox Study two of the foxes that were necropsied died due to rodenticide -NOT the one available to the public but second gen as used by Bristol City Council and although the Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme (WIIS) told us that the report was considered "not for the public" as it covered up misuse of rodenticide and lack of regular checking by Bristol City Council.
You have regular visiting hedgehogs for over 20 years. Rodenticide is put down (by BCC)  and two dead hedgehogs and the rest not seen again. After a gap of almost a year new hogs have appeared. There is your science.

Friday, 12 June 2026

Do NOT Interfere With An Active Fox Den

 

image used for illustration purposes

 Here is a problem we get all the time. Based on the response from the group it seems that studying the law regarding wildlife you deal with is a bore. Just as four badger cubs were transported without any documentation or license from the Isle of Wight to Somerset it seems that wildlife groups bend the law when it suits them.

On Greenwich Wildlife Network:

"We’ve found a fox and initially five (but now maybe three) cubs in a building site in kings X (between the British library and the Francis Crick Institute). We feel they may need to be moved before the building gets more intense?"

Adice: "Hi David, Unfortunately it isn't as simple as just moving foxes. Foxes are highly territorial animals, so if you remove them from their territory and place them somewhere else, they can be attacked by resident foxes and may struggle to find food, shelter and safe den sites.

There is also no guarantee that an entire family group could be trapped. You could easily end up leaving cubs or adults behind, separating the family and creating an even bigger welfare problem.

The good news is that foxes will often move cubs between several backup dens if they feel disturbed or unsafe, so they may relocate themselves as activity on the site increases.

We'd recommend contacting https://fox-a-gon.co.uk/ for advice on encouraging the family to move on naturally and humanely.

We would also strongly advise against using pest control companies that offer "humane relocation". In reality there is no genuinely humane way to relocate wild foxes long distances. Many foxes removed from their territory do not survive, and some companies may euthanise foxes despite using more reassuring language in their advertising.

If the site is due to be developed, it may also be worth speaking to the site manager so they are aware of the foxes' presence and can avoid any active den areas where possible"

I made it clear:

"Also it is illegal to tamper with an active den with cubs in: it is illegal and highly unethical to move, block, or destroy an active fox den while cubs are present. Under the UK's Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1995, intentionally causing suffering, crushing, or trapping animals inside a den is an offense. Everyone has now been notified publicly that there is a den and cubs so until dispersal season (around July) you cannot move. British Fox and Wild Canid Study f 1976"

Thursday, 11 June 2026

Have We LOST The War For The Environment and Wildlife?

 Simply: YES



People are not interested in standing up for anything outside of their houses and driveways. People do not stop when they hit wildlife and do not care if the animal takes hours to die -"Shouldn't be on the road" is the usual response.  

Mature growth trees chopped down ("unavoidable") -"so what?"

It is now declared that "five new towns" will be built around Bristol (we've already seen the damage one "new suburb" underway has done).  NOT towns but in reality suburbs and guess where some will be built? Green sites and on traditionally wildlife rich areas because "they are pretty sites".

We are going to see an increase in wildlife and particularly badger, deaths during building due to site traffic and poisonous/hazardous materials left out. That is standard. Once pushed out of traditional clan territories WHERE will the badgers go? Onto the new builds where a developer will "get rid of them on the quiet"?  Certainly you can be assured that new home owners will be driving their cars over or through wildlife.

Corrupt local authorities and corrupt governments don't care and they know that the great British 'animal loving' public will simply sit back and let them do what they want.

After 50+ years I can tell you that no matter how hard we battle the war is lost because in reality NO ONE really cares.

Tuesday, 9 June 2026

Can someone stop a rescuer treating sick wildlife? (they try -regularly)



legally, they generally cannot prevent authorized professionals or a member of the public from taking a sick, injured, or orphaned wild animal to a vet or rescue for adequate treatment. However, in practice, bystanders can create conflict, and there are varying rules depending on the situation and location. [1, 2]
The Legal Standing (UK)
  • Taking for Treatment: The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 legally permits anyone to take a sick, injured, or protected wild animal from the wild for the express purpose of providing it with adequate treatment and supportive care until it is fit to be released. [1]
  • Prevention Rights: A member of the public does not "own" the wildlife on their property. Therefore, they do not have the legal right to stop an authorized person (like an RSPCA officer or a licensed wildlife rehabilitator) from recovering or helping an animal in distress.
Private Property and Trespass
  • Access Rights: Private landowners can prevent rescuers from physically entering their land based on trespass laws. However, if an animal is in distress, rescuers often work with local authorities to negotiate access or involve the police to prevent an animal from being subjected to unnecessary suffering. [1, 2]
  • Interfering with a Rescue: Intentionally obstructing a lawful wildlife rescue or abusing a rescuer can escalate into a civil dispute or even a criminal offense, particularly if the prevention leads to cruelty or a protected species being harmed. [1]
Handling and Ethics
  • Intervention Debates: While people generally cannot stop rescuers, there is an ongoing ethical debate surrounding the rescue of wildlife. Some individuals believe in the natural order of things (survival of the fittest) and may voice frustration or try to stop well-meaning rescuers from intervening, though this does not grant them a legal right to stop the rescue. [1, 2]
  • The Danger of "Killing with Kindness": The British Wildlife Rehabilitation Council actively warns that while the public's intentions are compassionate, unlicensed or untrained individuals attempting to keep and treat wild animals themselves can cause more harm or delay necessary veterinary care. [1]
How to Handle Confrontation
If a property owner or bystander is attempting to obstruct a rescue, professional organizations strongly advise the following steps: [1]
  1. Avoid confrontation: Step away to ensure personal safety.
  2. Document the situation: Note the location, the animal's condition, and the person preventing the rescue.
  3. Involve authorities: Contact the Police or a national animal welfare charity (such as the RSPCA in the UK) to handle the dispute and ensure the animal receives the care it needs. [1, 2]

Facial Injury In Foxes CAN Be Treated

    The old rule under certain "rescue" was a fox with a facial injury HAD to be put down. Most vets would agree. However, things ...