If you want to know whether you are in a badger cull zone and want to find out about cull numbers then this link will take you to last years report
Friday, 14 January 2022
Badger deaths and post mortems.
I have checked with Post Mortem Services and have been told that none of the organisations associated with animal post mortems would take a badger for post mortem examination.
Thursday, 13 January 2022
Bristol Badgers
Back in 1994 in Ashton Vale (it was classed by Avon Wildlife Trust as a “wildlife deprivation zone” –ie. No wildlife recorded and so of no real interest) I saw and counted many beetles and other insects. I also saw a pair of foxes walk up the road and a pair of barn owls flew low down over me so that all the individual feathers and facial features were visible. Oh, and one of the biggest hedgehogs I had ever seen.
Over the next few days I noted field mice, feral pigeons as well as dumped racing pigeons, hawks and even buzzards, shrews all sorts of moths and butterflies and so I set about building the 50 x 70 feet garden into a wildlife friendly area –budleija, sunflowers, wild plants and the front garden was designed as a cottage garden. But with all this wildlife how could it be a “wildlife deprivation area”?
I contacted Avon Wildlife Trust and asked to whom I should send my wildlife survey (after a year of compiling it) ? I was told that they would be happy to hear of my survey after I had paid to join. I assumed there was a misunderstanding but I was told the same thing over the phone: no membership –no interest in the survey. I decided then and there to set up the Vale Wildlife Group (VWG). One thing I had not bargained on was the local hostility to wildlife!
I pointed out a woodpecker that had just flown onto a tree branch and my neighbour just shrugged “Another bloody bird is all” end of conversation. The wife of another neighbour told myself and a friend that if an hedgehog got in the way she just kicked it aside. I suddenly found that I was quite literally the focus of hate because I was trying to promote wildlife in the area. When the Yanley Quarry site was to be developed as a public park and nature reserve I was asked to be the wildlife consultant on the project –the harassment and anger aimed at me was incredible and the company turning an old tip into a public facility…I dread to think what backlash they faced.
The VWG continued and at least some locals were interested
in how to build wildlife ponds, get insects identified and even have an adder
removed from their back garden. Most queries for advice etc came from other
areas of
Around 1997 I was completing two technical papers when the
subject of badgers cropped up and I found myself involved in recording badger
activity. I then thought that it would be easier to pass the information on to
a local badger group and one was recorded as being at the RSPCA office in
Recently I have been asked for badger advice again and, it
appears, the only coverage for the City and
Consider this "Badgers In The City of Bristol" by Prof Stephen Harris, Dept of Biology, Bristol University from Biological Conservation journal Vol 28 no. 4, 1984 pp 349-375
http://www.badgerland.co.uk/education/journals/environment/bristol_badgers.html
Ecology of Urban badgers - Distribution in Britain and habitat selection, persecution, food and damage in the city of Bristol Few towns and cities in Britain were found to contain badgers, and in most the numbers of setts were low. Urban areas most likely to contain badgers were those in which badgers were common in the surrounding rural areas; most urban badger populations were thought to be relicts that had survived urban encroachment. In a detailed survey of Bristol, 346 setts were located in an area of 129·4 km2. These setts were confined mainly to three areas; their past history, present distribution, habitat selection and levels of disturbance are discussed. The damage caused by badgers in north-west Bristol to garden crops and other aspects of their nuisance value are documented. The food of badgers in the same area of Bristol is also described; unlike rural badgers they took a diversity of food types, but specialized in feeding on fruit in the autumn. |
Journal Biological Conservation - Volume 28, Issue 4 , 1984, Pages 349-375 Authors Stephen Harris from the Department of Zoology, University of Bristol Abstract Ecology of Urban badgers - Distribution in Britain and habitat selection, persecution, food and damage in the city of Bristol Few towns and cities in Britain were found to contain badgers, and in most the numbers of setts were low. Urban areas most likely to contain badgers were those in which badgers were common in the surrounding rural areas; most urban badger populations were thought to be relicts that had survived urban encroachment. In a detailed survey of Bristol, 346 setts were located in an area of 129·4 km2. These setts were confined mainly to three areas; their past history, present distribution, habitat selection and levels of disturbance are discussed. The damage caused by badgers in north-west Bristol to garden crops and other aspects of their nuisance value are documented. The food of badgers in the same area of Bristol is also described; unlike rural badgers they took a diversity of food types, but specialized in feeding on fruit in the autumn. |
We have any number of wildlife groups in various areas of
I know where there is badger activity in
1. Where badgers are in your area –this is NOT for public disclosure as too many “undesirables” monitor wildlife groups.
2. Do you know how many badgers and whether they have had young in 2021?
3. Have you noticed any illnesses or sign of possible ill health in badgers locally?
4. Do badgers and foxes appear to get on in your area?
5. I am only starting this particular one from yesterday (12th January): please report any dead badgers you see particularly any that look like they died unusually
As we have trouble storing and transporting dead foxes to Langford for post mortem we cannot do this for badgers. A dead badger would need to be placed in a bin-liner and kept cold or frozen and then transported so unless a group can undertake that it is beyond anything I can do. I will be checking with Post Mortem Services re. the situation in accepting badgers though.
Please contact me through Face Book messenger but do not post locations of badgers etc on groups. Thanks.
Says It All: A Diversity of Wildlife Is Good for Our Health: To Prevent Future Pandemics, We Must Restore and Protect Nature
This post from SciTech says it all but is still only just skimming the surface.
By CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES MAY 8, 2021
A growing body of evidence suggests that biodiversity loss increases our exposure to both new and established zoonotic pathogens. Restoring and protecting nature is essential to preventing future pandemics. So reports a new Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) paper that synthesizes current understanding about how biodiversity affects human health and provides recommendations for future research to guide management.
Lead author Felicia Keesing is a professor at Bard College and a Visiting Scientist at Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies. She explains, “There’s a persistent myth that wild areas with high levels of biodiversity are hotspots for disease. More animal diversity must equal more dangerous pathogens. But this turns out to be wrong. Biodiversity isn’t a threat to us, it’s actually protecting us from the species most likely to make us sick.”
Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19, SARS, and Ebola are caused by pathogens that are shared between humans and other vertebrate animals. But animal species differ in their ability to pass along pathogens that make us sick.
Rick Ostfeld is a disease ecologist at Cary Institute and a co-author on the paper. He explains, “Research is mounting that species that thrive in developed and degraded landscapes are often much more efficient at harboring pathogens and transmitting them to people. In less-disturbed landscapes with more animal diversity, these risky reservoirs are less abundant and biodiversity has a protective effect.”
Rodents, bats, primates, cloven-hooved mammals like sheep and deer, and carnivores have been flagged as the mammal taxa most likely to transmit pathogens to humans. Keesing and Ostfeld note, “The next emerging pathogen is far more likely to come from a rat than a rhino.”
This is because animals with fast life histories tend to be more efficient at transmitting pathogens. Keesing explains, “Animals that live fast, die young, and have early sexual maturity with lots of offspring tend to invest less in their adaptive immune responses. They are often better at transmitting diseases, compared to longer-lived animals with stronger adaptive immunity.”
When biodiversity is lost from ecological communities, long-lived, larger-bodied species tend to disappear first, while smaller-bodied species with fast life histories tend to proliferate. Research has found that mammal hosts of zoonotic viruses are less likely to be species of conservation concern (i.e. they are more common), and that for both mammals and birds, human development tends to increase the abundance of zoonotic host species, bringing people and risky animals closer together.
“When we erode biodiversity, we favor species that are more likely to be zoonotic hosts, increasing our risk of spillover events,” Ostfeld notes. Adding that, “Managing this risk will require a better understanding of how things like habitat conversion, climate change, and overharvesting affect zoonotic hosts, and how restoring biodiversity to degraded areas might reduce their abundance.”
To predict and prevent spillover, Keesing and Ostfeld highlight the need to focus on host attributes associated with disease transmission rather than continuing to debate the prime importance of one taxon or another. Ostfeld explains, “We should stop assuming that there is a single animal source for each emerging pathogen. The pathogens that jump from animals to people tend to be found in many animal species, not just one. They’re jumpers, after all, and they typically move between species readily.”
Disentangling the characteristics of effective zoonotic hosts – such as their immune strategies, resilience to disturbance, and habitat preferences – is key to protecting public health. Forecasting the locations where these species thrive, and where pathogen transmission and emergence are likely, can guide targeted interventions.
Keesing notes, “Restoration of biodiversity is an important frontier in the management of zoonotic disease risk. Those pathogens that do spill over to infect humans–zoonotic pathogens–often proliferate as a result of human impacts.” Concluding, “As we rebuild our communities after COVID-19, we need to have firmly in mind that one of our best strategies to prevent future pandemics is to protect, preserve, and restore biodiversity.”
Reference: “Impacts of biodiversity and biodiversity loss on zoonotic diseases” by Felicia Keesing and Richard S. Ostfeld, 5 April 2021, Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2023540118
This research was supported by a National Science Foundation Grant OPUS 1948419 to Keesing.
Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies is an independent nonprofit center for environmental research. Since 1983, our scientists have been investigating the complex interactions that govern the natural world and the impacts of climate change on these systems. Our findings lead to more effective management and policy actions and increased environmental literacy. Staff are global experts in the ecology of: cities, disease, forests, and freshwater.
Conifer plantation push could threaten red squirrel population...the threat is actually Humans
I have to say that I am getting more than a little fed up at all of this "red squirrels were being wiped out by grey squirrels" nonsense. Back in March I referred to the question about the red squirrel https://exoticanimalsregister.blogspot.com/2021/03/uk-and-exotic-species-human-aided.html
People are still -still- shooting and trapping red squirrels as "vermin" -especially where forestry that is seen as a financial investment is concerned. Talking to someone the other day I was told the owner of a large country estate had been out a couple weeks back shooting red squirrels, rabbits and anything else he and his associates could find. The idea and practice of the medieval fiefdom where the lord and master can do whatever he wants still exists in the UK. Policem, RSPCA et al: "private property we can't go onto the land there" -even when they know wildlife crimes are being committed.
So the idea that we had a great red squirrel population before the grey squirrel got here is rot. The grey adapts to a situation while the red seems stuck in a rut of sorts. The new forestry planted will be looked at as a financial investment not just to clean up our air. Red squirrels damage trees (barking etc) then watch them disappear. Who knows they vanish and if they find out it is a case of "Oh, those bloody grey squirrels" and everyone sits back in the ignorance they have been fed and repeat "Bloody grey squirrels. Vermin"
Also worth pointing out that the red squirrels today are NOT our original squirrels who shared the same fate as our Old foxes and were replaced by imported squirrels to continue the 'sport'.
Face it; for a nation of "animal lovers" we still allow fox-hunting, badger baiting and so much more and the squirrel is just one victim in all of this. A well financed independent UK wide wildlife agency is needed and when I write independent I mean independent of the government nationally or locally and with powers to enforce protective legislation on private and common land.
Fiona Harvey Yahoo! Environment Correspndent
Research shows planned expansion of conifer woodlands across the UK could have unintended consequences
Conifer plantations, which are being expanded around the UK to combat the climate crisis and foster biodiversity, are in danger of hurting one of the key species they were thought to protect: red squirrels.
The threatened red squirrels, driven to near-extinction over most of the UK by grey squirrel incursion, were thought to thrive in conifer habitats as the food sources in such forests tend to be limited to small seeded cones, which red squirrels are better at exploiting than the more generalist grey squirrels. That should mean conifer plantations prove better for red squirrels than greys.
But new research upends that perception by highlighting the role of pine martens. These native predators were until recently, like the red squirrel, in short supply. Recovery in their numbers has shown that pine martens are generally good for red squirrel populations, at least in native broadleaf woodlands, because they suppress the numbers of grey squirrels.
The research, published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, found this was not true in conifer plantations, where pine martens lack diverse sources of food and prey on red squirrels instead, turning them from a protector to a threat.
To conduct the research, scientists from Queen’s University Belfast and the University of St Andrews, with Ulster Wildlife and the help of citizen scientists, used camera traps to survey more than 700 sites across Northern Ireland over a five-year period, looking for red squirrels, grey squirrels and pine martens.
Dr Joshua Twining, lead author of the research, from Queen’s University in Belfast, explained the findings: “In natural woodland, there are diverse amounts of prey, and lots of refuges for squirrels, so red squirrels don’t get predated all that much. But in conifer plantations, where a single species is planted and of uniform age there is very little biodiversity or alternate prey, and an absence of refuges, so pine martens will eat red squirrels to survive here.”
He said the research suggested that woodland managers should reconsider whether conifer plantations should be preferred over native broadleaf trees. “We need to adapt our strategy: if we keep planting conifer plantations, as opposed to native woodland, this saviour of the red squirrel may cause its decline in certain locations,” he warned. About three-quarters of the forested area of the UK and Ireland is made up of non-native timber plantations, of species such as the sitka spruce, according to the researchers.
Conifer plantations were already a cause of concern to ecologists, as they tend to be monocultures, are often harvested after a few decades, and may provide less diversity than native broadleaf species. But government planting schemes in the UK and Ireland have tended to favour conifers, which are easier to plant and harvest.
A spokesperson for the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: “We are committed to taking action to recover our threatened native species in England, such as the red squirrel. The planting of coniferous trees in England is at a low level, with our Nature for Climate Fund focusing on the establishment of native broadleaf woodlands at a large scale. Alongside our England Trees Action Plan, this will support the recovery of native red squirrel populations across the country.”
Thursday, 23 December 2021
Avian Influenza -interactive map (UK)
This link will take you to the Animal Plant Health Advisory interactive maps and it is well worth keeping updated on protection zones and the spread.
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8cb1883eda5547c6b91b5d5e6aeba90d
Wednesday, 15 December 2021
Paramyxovirus (PMV) and Pigeons
I have taken this information from the Pigeon Aid page. Having dealt with several pigeons with PMV I know the old rule was that if it had PMV it had to be put down -luckily I found PMV pigeon sanctuaries where the rescued birds could live in a flock situation with others.
http://www.pigeon-aid.org.uk/pa/html/paramyxovirus__pmv_.php
The Pigeon Aid page was last updated in 2011 and there seems to be no contact email. However, it provides excellent information for anyone finding a sick pigeon..
You can find the Gov.UK advice on PMV here:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/paramyxovirus-infection#legislation-on-paramyxovirus
a pigeon with PMV (c) respective copyright owner. Pigeon.biz**Please remember that whenever you take in a sick pigeon it is vital that you warm it up before feeding or giving water and that you rehydrate it before feeding. All fluids should be warmed to 39 degrees centigrade.** PIGEON PARAMYXOVIRUS is a viral disease that does not affect man or animals, but a human that handles a pigeon with PMV or the live vaccine can develop conjunctivitis if sensible precautions are not taken (eg, do not touch your eyes immediately after handling a pigeon with PMV or the live vaccine).
SYMPTOMS:
HOUSING
FEEDING AND WATERING
NURSING CARE
**Remember not to touch homeopathic pilules with your hands, this can contaminate them and reduce effectiveness, give them on a clean mouth (no food or additions to the drinking water 20 minutes before or 20 minutes after) and stop the remedy as soon as an improvement shows**
PREVENTION AND CONTROL
|
Hedgehogs, like the Fox and Badger, Heading for Extinction
People keep posting online and saying that hedgehogs are recovering after being Red Listed. I keep telling them that the species has not...
-
We have in Bristol thousands who are members of the Bristol Naturalist Society, Bristol Nature Network and many area wildlife groups. For f...
-
We are repeatedly seeing Bristol City Council and its elected officers breaking the law for the sake of development and profit -the Yew Tr...
-
I have seen on Face Book today someone stating they have rats. Theresponsewas to put a plate of baked beans outside with poison in them. Th...