I have written before about essential oils for repelling rats (a few
years ago now) and this afternoon I went to get papers from a corner
of the room and...big (BIG)black ants all over the table.
I DO NOT kill ants
and they serve a useful purpose but when crawling over my face when i
can sleep at night is not good.
How could I get rid
of my little cousins without killing? What repels ants naturally?
Mint. Plant
mint around perimeter of your home to repel insects. ...
Vinegar. Mix a
50/50 solution of vinegar and water in a spray bottle. ...
Lemon Juice.
...
Cinnamon. ...
Cayenne Pepper
or Black Pepper. ...
Food-Grade
Diatomaceous Earth.
Now I am always
dubious but we had some essential oils peppermint so sprinkled some
about 3 inches from the ants...within 5 minutes they had packed up
and left. I just stared blankly but I have now found a way of keeping
both colonies (back garden invading the kitchen and front just
breaking and entering) out.
They now know that I
have a weapon of mass smellyness
For many the lynx (Lynx lynx) died out during the last ice age in Britain. However, the historical evidence shows that it continued until hunted to extinction during the Medieval period.
Over recent years many have claimed that the lynx in fact survived up to the 18th century -some state it survived later than that.
In this publication naturalist Terry Hooper-Scharf assesses the evidence and points to reports and other factors not widely known to draw a definitive conclusion on the subject
Having posted a photograph of a badger seen out during the early morning (the person who photographed it wanted to alert residents to keep their dogs safe 😒) there was some concern expressed that the badger might need help.
The daytime badger photo that caused concern. (c)2023 Bristol Badger Group
One suggestion was that the badger had been ousted from the sett.
Another suggestion was that the sett may have been interfered with and the badger was escaping.
Another was that it might be starving.
In fact there is nothing abnormal about seeing a badger in the early morning or early evening especially in summer time. There are a good few photos of badgers in daylight and in the above (Bristol) case we do not know where the sett is but the badger could well have been returning to it.
Above: a badger out during early evening (c)2023 Time Out With Nature
It seems to be that naturalists tend not to know themselves that, like foxes, badgers in what they consider to be a safe area will venture out into daylight. W. Kay Robinson who founded the once notable British Naturalists Association (1905), wrote in Britain's Beasts of Prey (1949) of the number of cases of walkers reporting being 'chased' by a bear in the woods and others also noted these 'bear' incidents. The 'bears' were of course badgers and I doubt they chased anyone unless it was a sow with cubs close by (even that would be unusual.
(c)2023 respective copyright holder
The only time to be concerned is if you see that the badger is injured/bleeding or if someone is interfering with a sett or some sort of development in underway near a sett (it is illegal to damage or destroy a sett though we have caught a few contractors/developers trying this and pleading ignorance). If you see an injured badger contact your local wildlife rescue (in the Bristol region Secret World). If you see a sett being damaged then contact the local police and RSPCA and explain what is going on. With the developers we came across it was pointed out that they were breaking the law and it was explained that there was a big fine and, extremely bad publicity for the company and the area was left alone and some cover replaced over setts.
""This is why we have used our powers as regulators to see that justice was done and to act as a stark warning to others that we will take the strongest action against those who do not respect the laws that protect the environment and wildlife we all cherish."
Meanwhile they do nothing and DEFRA are making badgers (a 'protected' species in the UK) extinct.
Some thinking is off kilter here.
A farmer has been jailed after illegally bulldozing a riverside beauty spot, causing a "devastating" effect on local wildlife.
John Price, 68, claimed he used a digger to dredge a stretch of the River Lugg near Leominster, Herefordshire, in December 2020 to protect local homes from flooding.
But Natural England officials said the river - a protected Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and one of the UK’s most important salmon rivers - had been "decimated" by the work and habitats of "iconic wildlife" such as otters, kingfishers and salmon had also been destroyed.
Price was found guilty of seven offences relating to breaching a Natural England stop notice at Kidderminster Magistrates’ Court and has been jailed for 12 months.
He has also been disqualified from being a company director for three years and has been ordered to repay the estimated £655,000 cost of the damage to the river and its embankments, along with £600,000 in court costs.
Sentencing Price, Judge Ian Strongman said: "Any person could not fail to be dismayed by the devastation caused by Mr Price - he has turned it into a canal devoid of most life. It is ecological vandalism on an industrial scale.
"It was a desire to reduce the risk of flooding. Some residents who live nearby are grateful for Mr Price for taking this action.
"The Environment Agency said the overall river level as high as recent years but Mr Price's actions have made things worse.
"It is total ignorance to nature and the environment."
Natural England and the Environment Agency described the damage as the worst case of riverside destruction they had ever seen and could take several decades to be fully restored.
John Price used an 18-tonne digger to dredge a section of the River Lugg and stripped a mile-long stretch of the bank of trees, claiming he was fixing the erosion of the river bed and was helping to solve flooding issues.
Homes near to the stretch of river were flooded during Storm Dennis in early 2020, but when Storm Christoph hit in January 2021, they stayed dry.
Speaking after he cleared the riverbank, he said: “I'm a Herefordshire farmer and have lived at Hay Farm and was born here at home.
“I have never moved and have watched this river all my life and no one knows this river better than myself.
“I have always looked after the river. I was asked to stop the erosion because I'm the landowner so I'm responsible for the river.
“It was up to the Environmental Agency to look after these rivers but they don't do any work and haven't got any money to do the work because they spend it all on clipboards.
“I have not pushed any trees out and I haven't knocked any trees down I have only cleared what ones came down in the flood.”
But wildlife experts described his actions as "devastating" and said he had actually weakened flood prevention measures rather than improved them.
Emma Johnson, area manager for Natural England, said: “The destruction of this section of the River Lugg was devastating for the abundance and range of species which thrived in this river.
"The River Lugg is one of the most iconic rivers in the UK and to see this wanton destruction take place was devastating.
"This is why we have used our powers as regulators to see that justice was done and to act as a stark warning to others that we will take the strongest action against those who do not respect the laws that protect the environment and wildlife we all cherish."
Martin Quine, Environment Agency place manager for Herefordshire, said restoring the health of Britain's rivers was a "complex task" that could "only be achieved in partnership with landowners".
He said: “While Mr Price’s justification for the works was to help prevent flooding to local properties, his actions did not have any flood prevention benefit.
"The destruction of river banks is not appropriate flood management. It is important that the Judge recognised that the works significantly weakened flood prevention measures rather than improved them.
“We urge landowners never to take extreme measure such as this and instead to always work closely with the Environment Agency around river management to agree the best solutions for both landowners and the environment.”
Helen Stace, CEO of the Herefordshire Wildlife Trust, described Price's actions previously as a “crime against the environment”, while BBC Gardeners’ World host Monty Don also expressed his shock at the “complete obliteration” of the site.
He said: "It breaks my heart but is all too-typical of the ignorance, arrogance and sheer wanton destruction of those privileged to care for our countryside."
The government’s annual badger cull, which began in 2013, has always been shrouded in secrecy. And now Freedom of Information (FOI) responses reveal the extent of Natural England’s underhanded tactics as it murders our beloved species.
Environmental journalist Tracy Keeling accessed the FOI requests, and reported her findings in the Canary. She found that since 2017 Natural England – which is sponsored by Defra – has been secretly expanding badger cull areas, some by more than 100km². The aim of the cull in these expanded areas is the same as in the original areas: to murder at least 70% of the local badger population.
As Keeling reports, the original cull areas were subject to public consultation, yet these expansions have been done without public knowledge, and wouldn’t have been revealed to the public without the FOI responses.
What, exactly, is the badger cull?
The badger cull has taken place every year for the past decade. Natural England issues four-year licences to land owners in different cull zones across the country, along with target figures of the number of badgers it wants murdered. Badgers are then intensively shot and trapped for a six-week period each year, usually beginning in September. The government argues that culling badgers prevents the spread of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle, but studies have found that this is ludicrous.
The boundaries of each cull zone have always been kept a secret, and activists trying to save badgers have had to guess where one zone ends and another begins. The government also keeps it a secret as to which land owners take part in the cull, too, although it’s a good bet that if a farmer’s cattle has bTB, he will be murdering badgers on his land.
The government officially stopped issuing the four year licences in 2022. But instead of phasing out the cull (as it led the public to believe), it introduced another way to extend it. When a cull zone’s four-year licence has come to an end, Natural England can then grant it a supplementary licence. These licences permit land owners to murder badgers for another two years. In 2022 alone, the government awarded two-year supplementary licences to murder badgers in ten new locations across the country, which were licensed to run until January 2024.
Keeling discovered that Natural England approved 10 expansions to cull zones in 2022. She said:
“This amounted to badger killing on an additional 327km² of land. In 2021, it greenlit eight extension areas totalling 342km² in all.”
The FOI responses show that one cull area in Avon was expanded by 136km² in 2021, while an area in Shropshire was expanded by 173km² in 2022. Keeling argues that these new areas “are clearly large enough to qualify as cull zones in their own right.”
Badgers are murdered more intensively in these expanded areas. As Keeling reported, Natural England admitted in one FOI response:
“Larger extension areas are monitored separately to the rest to the area to ensure an effective cull is achieved in a reduced number of years. This includes requiring an increase in cage trapping and controlled shooting similar to that required in year 1 of a licensed area.”
Keeling said:
“This indicates that larger extension areas are operating in some respects as if they are separate badger culls. This includes apparently aiming to kill badgers more intensely than the cull areas they are attached to, due to the reduced number of years of operation.”
Natural England can’t officially introduce new cull zones in 2023, having stated that it stopped issuing four-year licences in 2022. So these expansions – adding more land to existing zones – will likely be used extensively from 2023 onwards. It is the government’s way of making new cull zones without actually having to admit that it is doing so.
A bleak future
The future for our badgers is looking dire. Once cull zones’ four-year licences come to an end, and then their two-year supplementary licences also come to an end, the government may continue to issue licences indefinitely to kill badgers at a targeted, local level from 2026, although it hasn’t made official statements regarding how this would be implemented.
The majority of badgers are murdered in the most cruel way, killed by ‘free shooting’: that is, hunters stand in a field and shoot at the badger from afar. One badger can take many excrutiating minutes to die, and can be hit with multiple gunshot wounds.
“We could kill every badger in England and remove them in parts of the country where they have lived for over half a million years and TB would still be present in the national cattle herd.”
It is estimated that half of the UK’s badger population has now been murdered in the government’s misguided campaign to eradicate bTB. A number of areas in the UK are now facing local badger extinctions.
You can fight the cull
You can get involved in the fight against the cull by joining one of many local groups who go out to try to stop the shooting and trapping. Search for your local group and help to save our precious badgers.